Serves as outside counsel to the South Carolina State Ports Authority (“SCSPA”), the fourth busiest container port in North America.  In that capacity, we have counseled the SCSPA in connection with a variety of matters, including: land use and zoning issues arising out of the construction and operation of containerized and break bulk cargo terminals; land use, right-of-way acquisition, business, finance and political issues relating to the $650 million design and construction of the Cooper River Bridges Replacement Project; environmental impact, permitting, landlord-tenant/licensing issues associated with the SCSPA’s acquisition and use of the former Charleston Naval Base from the United States Government and the South Carolina Redevelopment Authority; nuclear, security and other regulatory issues associated with marine cargo being transported through the Port of Charleston, South Carolina; traditional and alternative methods of project and capital asset finance, state and federal grants, loans and funding mechanisms; local, state and federal governmental regulations; and dispute resolution in connection with procurement challenges and major commercial contract disputes.

Charleston Int'l Ports, LLC v. S.C. State Ports Authority, No. 02-01973 (D.S.C. filed June 7, 2002).

Experience Center

Match our Experience to Your Needs

View All Case Studies

Experience Highlights

National counsel and local trial counsel for an international engineering and construction firm
The firm served as national counsel and local trial counsel (including 5 trials) for an international engineering and construction firm in asbestos more
Litigation for Frank's Landing Indian Community
Represent Frank's Landing Indian Community, a self-governing dependent Indian community, against claims of Plaintiff Tribe alleging that federal law more
Regulatory action defense for a global leader in information solutions
Represented a global leader in information solutions and its subsidiary in connection with an Federal Trade Commission investigation into possible more
Cavalier v. Jim Henson Co., Inc.
Won summary adjudication on behalf of defendants The Jim Henson Company, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Viacom Inc. in an idea submission case on the more